Member-only story

Implications Of Partisan Budgeting For Responding To Public Health Emergencies

Langston Hughes

·9k Followers· Follow

Published in Pandemics And Polarization: Implications Of Partisan Budgeting For Responding To Public Health Emergencies

6 min read · 2 weeks before

990 View Claps

55 Respond

Save

Listen

Partisan budgeting, the practice of allocating government resources based on political considerations rather than objective needs, has become increasingly common in recent years. This trend has had a number of negative consequences, including gridlock, inefficiency, and a decline in public trust.

One of the most concerning consequences of partisan budgeting is its impact on the government's ability to respond to public health emergencies. When government resources are allocated based on political considerations, rather than on the basis of need, it can be difficult to ensure that the necessary resources are available to respond to a crisis.

Pandemics and Polarization: Implications of Partisan Budgeting for Responding to Public Health Emergencies

5 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	728 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	265 pages

The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed the dangers of partisan budgeting in stark terms. The Trump administration's repeated attempts to downplay the severity of the pandemic and its resistance to calls for a national mask mandate and other public health measures hindered the government's ability to respond effectively to the crisis. As a result, the United States has suffered one of the highest death tolls from COVID-19 in the world.

The COVID-19 pandemic is not the first public health emergency to be impacted by partisan budgeting. In 2009, the Obama administration's efforts to respond to the H1N1 pandemic were hampered by partisan gridlock in Congress. As a result, the government was slow to make essential resources available, and the pandemic caused more deaths than it otherwise would have.

Partisan budgeting is a serious threat to our national security. It undermines the government's ability to respond to public health emergencies, and it puts the lives of Americans at risk.

The Impact of Partisan Budgeting on Public Health Funding

Partisan budgeting has a significant impact on public health funding. When government resources are allocated based on political considerations, rather than on the basis of need, it can be difficult to ensure that essential public health programs are adequately funded.

This is a particular concern in the context of public health emergencies. When a public health emergency strikes, it is essential that the government have the resources in place to respond effectively. This includes funding for public health surveillance, outbreak investigation, and emergency preparedness.

However, partisan budgeting often leads to cuts in public health funding. In the United States, for example, the Trump administration has proposed cuts to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and other public health agencies. These cuts would have a devastating impact on the government's ability to respond to public health emergencies.

The impact of partisan budgeting on public health funding is not just a theoretical concern. It has real-world consequences. For example, a study by the Kaiser Family Foundation found that states that cut public health funding were more likely to experience outbreaks of infectious diseases.

Partisan budgeting is a serious threat to our public health. It undermines the government's ability to fund essential public health programs, and it puts the lives of Americans at risk.

The Impact of Partisan Budgeting on Public Health Policy

In addition to its impact on public health funding, partisan budgeting also has a significant impact on public health policy. When government resources are allocated based on political considerations, rather than on the basis of evidence, it can be difficult to ensure that public health policies are based on sound science.

This is a particular concern in the context of public health emergencies. When a public health emergency strikes, it is essential that the government have the ability to implement evidence-based policies to protect the public's health.

However, partisan budgeting often leads to the adoption of public health policies that are not based on sound science. For example, the Trump administration has repeatedly promoted the use of hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for COVID-19, despite the lack of evidence supporting its effectiveness.

The impact of partisan budgeting on public health policy is not just a theoretical concern. It has real-world consequences. For example, a study by the Commonwealth Fund found that states with Republican governors were more likely to adopt policies that restricted access to health care during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Partisan budgeting is a serious threat to our public health. It undermines the government's ability to implement evidence-based public health policies, and it puts the lives of Americans at risk.

The Role of Partisan Budgeting in the COVID-19 Pandemic

The Trump administration's response to the COVID-19 pandemic was not just a failure of leadership. It was also a failure of governance. Partisan budgeting played a significant role in the government's failure to respond effectively to the crisis.

For example, the Trump administration's proposed cuts to the CDC and other public health agencies would have made it more difficult for the government to respond to the pandemic. These cuts were ultimately blocked by Congress, but they illustrate the dangers of partisan budgeting.

The COVID-19 pandemic is a wake-up call. It is time for us to reject partisan budgeting and to demand a government that is committed to protecting the public's health.

Partisan budgeting is a serious threat to our national security. It undermines the government's ability to respond to public health emergencies, and it puts the lives of Americans at risk.

The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed the dangers of partisan budgeting in stark terms. It is time for us to reject partisan budgeting and to demand a government that is committed to protecting the public's health.

References

* [1] The Impact of Partisan Budgeting on Public Health Funding: https://www.kff.org/health-reform/issue-brief/the-impact-of-partisan-budgeting-on-public-health-funding/ * [2] The Impact of Partisan Budgeting on Public Health Policy: https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/issue-briefs/2020/mar/impact-partisan-budgeting-public-health-policy * [3] The Role of Partisan Budgeting in the COVID-19 Pandemic: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/07/13/how-partisan-budgeting-hampered-us-coronavirus-response/

Pandemics and Polarization: Implications of Partisan Budgeting for Responding to Public Health Emergencies

5 out of 5